The proposed assisted dying bill stands as a stark contradiction to democratic principles, given its absence from Labour's manifesto. This bill, with its profound societal implications, lacks the mandate that a democratic process demands. MPs, while debating this critical issue, appear driven by personal convictions rather than the voices of their constituents. How can such a pivotal decision rest on the whims of a few, rather than the collective will of the people?
The heart of a true democracy beats with the pulse of its citizens. Yet, this process seems skewed, ignoring the foundational principle of representation. The reason MPs are not allowing a public vote on this issue is because they know the general public would not vote for a bill for killing the msot vulnerable, and it would never pass. Decisions of this magnitude, especially those affecting the vulnerable, should emerge from the consensus of the populace, not merely the corridors of power. The words of John 10:10 (NIV) remind us, "The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy; I have come that they may have life, and have it to the full." We must choose life, as Deuteronomy 30:19 urges us, embracing a society that values and protects the vulnerable.
Let us stand firm against this bill, advocating for a process that truly represents the people's voice. #ChooseLife #ProLife #DemocraticProcess #VoiceOfThePeople
The heart of a true democracy beats with the pulse of its citizens. Yet, this process seems skewed, ignoring the foundational principle of representation. The reason MPs are not allowing a public vote on this issue is because they know the general public would not vote for a bill for killing the msot vulnerable, and it would never pass. Decisions of this magnitude, especially those affecting the vulnerable, should emerge from the consensus of the populace, not merely the corridors of power. The words of John 10:10 (NIV) remind us, "The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy; I have come that they may have life, and have it to the full." We must choose life, as Deuteronomy 30:19 urges us, embracing a society that values and protects the vulnerable.
Let us stand firm against this bill, advocating for a process that truly represents the people's voice. #ChooseLife #ProLife #DemocraticProcess #VoiceOfThePeople
The proposed assisted dying bill stands as a stark contradiction to democratic principles, given its absence from Labour's manifesto. This bill, with its profound societal implications, lacks the mandate that a democratic process demands. MPs, while debating this critical issue, appear driven by personal convictions rather than the voices of their constituents. How can such a pivotal decision rest on the whims of a few, rather than the collective will of the people?
The heart of a true democracy beats with the pulse of its citizens. Yet, this process seems skewed, ignoring the foundational principle of representation. The reason MPs are not allowing a public vote on this issue is because they know the general public would not vote for a bill for killing the msot vulnerable, and it would never pass. Decisions of this magnitude, especially those affecting the vulnerable, should emerge from the consensus of the populace, not merely the corridors of power. The words of John 10:10 (NIV) remind us, "The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy; I have come that they may have life, and have it to the full." We must choose life, as Deuteronomy 30:19 urges us, embracing a society that values and protects the vulnerable.
Let us stand firm against this bill, advocating for a process that truly represents the people's voice. #ChooseLife #ProLife #DemocraticProcess #VoiceOfThePeople
0 Comments
0 Shares